Jenkins and Bamboo serve as continuous integration (CI) tools that allow developers to integrate code branches during the development process and run a series of automated tests against them. They both transform the time -consuming, manual task of building, testing, and deploying software into a fast, automated process.

When comparing Bamboo with Jenkins, we need to consider your business needs and budget. Although they cover much of the same thing, they do so in very different ways.

Jenkins

Jenkins is the most popular open-source automation server that was written in a java programming language. It facilitates the automation process of continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) in the software development process.

Jenkins supports over 1,400 plugins for other software tools. These plugins expand Jenkins into five years; platforms, UI, administration, source code management, and build management.

Jenkins is easy to install and use. It provides an impressive browser-hosted project management dashboard.

Some of the common reasons to evaluate and choose Jenkins are:

• Open-source and free
• Widely used and well documented
• Vibrant user community
• Integration with a large variety of tools and technologies.
• Plugin support

Bamboo

The Bamboo is a CI and CD server from Atlassian. Like Jenkins, Bamboo allows developers to automatically build, integrate, and test source code, then prepare the app for deployment. Bamboo also works effortlessly with Atlassian’s other tools like Jira (project management) and Hipchat (team communication).

The purpose of Bamboo is to provide developers with an environment which quickly compiles code for testing so that release cycles can be quickly implemented in production. It can also be customized with tons of features and add-ons that can be found at the Atlassian Marketplace. For example, it’s possible to get a plugin for slack notifications.

Some reasons to evaluate and choose Bamboo include:

• The bets JIRA integration
• Flexible CI and CD pipelines
• First-class support for deployments
• Painless CI on the branch
• Automated merging
• Fast import from Jenkins
• Legendary support and resources
• Powerful build agent management
• On the fly customizations

Jenkins Vs. Bamboo Comparison Table

The following are the primary comparison between Jenkins and Bamboo:

Jenkins Bamboo
Jenkins is open-source. Bamboo is not open-source.
Jenkins is free. The price of Bamboo is changed depending on the number of build agents required.
We can install Jenkins on Windows, Ubuntu/Debian, RedHat, Fedora, CentOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Mac OS X, OpenSUSE, Gentoo. Bamboo can be installed on Microsoft Windows, Solaris, Linux, MacOS/OSX, and others.
Jenkins can support databases like SQL Server, SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and H2 database. Bamboo supports MySQL, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, Oracle 12c H2 database.
Jenkins supports browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer. Bamboo supports Firefox, Chrome, Edge, and Safari.
Jenkins supports a lot of plugins. Bamboo does not support many plugins as compared to Jenkins.
Being open-source, Jenkins has a lot of support from communities. Bamboo has not much support as compared to Jenkins.
Jenkins supports CVS and Subversion, built-in support for Git, and also integrates with a large number of other version control systems by plugins. It supports Git, CVS, Perforce, Mercurial, and Subversion.
Jenkins features 127 plugins just for reporting purposes. That’s almost as much as Bamboo can offer in total reporting plugins.
With Jenkins, we can use HTML publisher plugin for publishing HTML report. With Bamboo, we can create a new shared Artifact, for publishing HTML report.
With the help of Jenkins plugins, we can do the Unit Test. In Bamboo also, we can run a Unit Test with the help of plugins.
In Jenkins, there is no option for Built-in deployment projects. Bamboo has built-in deployment projects functionality.
In Jenkins, there is no built-in functionality for branch management. But we can achieve branching using plugins like Multi-Branch Project, and others. Bamboo does a great job with branches; it has built-in support for branching.

Jenkins VS TeamCity

Jenkins and TeamCity serve as continuous integration (CI) tools that allow developers to integrate code branches during the development process and run a series of automated tests against them.

Although they cover much of the same thing, they do so in very different ways.

Jenkins

Jenkins supports over 1,400 plugins for other software tools. These plugins expand Jenkins into five years; platforms, UI, administration, source code management, and build management.

Jenkins is easy to install and use. It provides an impressive browser-hosted project management dashboard.

Some of the common reasons to evaluate and choose Jenkins are:

• Open-source and free
• Widely used and well documented
• Vibrant user community
• Integration with a large variety of tools and technologies.
• Plugin support

TeamCity

TeamCity is another commercial CI/CD server. It is also a java-based CI server package.

TeamCity is a build management tool and automation server. It was made by JetBrains. It permits users to customize on their own according to their environment and need.

The TeamCity server is a primary component, but the browser-hosted interface serves as the primary way to administer TeamCity users, projects, agents, and build configuration.

The TeamCity browser-hosted dashboard is outstanding. It handles project status and reporting information suitable for a broad range of users and project stakeholders. It provides drill-down detail, build progress, and history information on the projects and configurations.

There are many good reasons to choose TeamCity. Some other reasons to choose TeamCity include:

• Easy to setup, use, and configure
• Widely used and well documented
• Integration with a large variety of tools and technologies
• Professional server is free for up to twenty build configurations.

TeamCity provides limited features as freeware under some terms and conditions. It was based on server-based web application and supported servlet based servers like Apache Tomcat etc. It supports different platforms such as Rub, Java, and .NET.

Jenkins Vs. TeamCity Comparison Table

The following are the primary comparison between Jenkins and TeamCity:

Jenkins TeamCity
It was licensed under MIT license. It was licensed under a proprietary commercial license.
It was developed by Oracle then Sun and was later open-sourced. It was developed by JetBrains software company.
It supports CVS, Git, SubVersion, Mercurial, AccuRev, ClearCase, RTC It supports CVS, Git, SubVersion, Perforce, IBM ClearCase, Mercurial, SourceGear Vault.
It supports Unix, Windows-like operating systems and Mac OS X It concentrates completely on operating systems rather than a particular area.
It is open-source and free. It is commercial and paid and has only a few features for free of cost.
It supports advanced features compared to TeamCity It does not have advanced features.
It provides less security compared to TeamCity. It provides more security features compared to Jenkins.
It is widely used across multiple organizations. It is less used and has commercial features in it.
Jenkins is well documented and available in its open-source site. TeamCity does not have well documentations provided by its site.
Jenkins is not easier to set up and configure. TeamCity to easier to use, configure, and set up the installation and integrating with the version control system.
Jenkins does not have the individual validation feature. Teamcity has individual validation feature.
Jenkins does not support port flexibility feature. TeamCity has port flexibility feature.
Jenkins has plugin features and is having mostly plugin ecosystem. TeamCity has out of box features with excellent build process history.

So, this brings us to the end of blog. This Tecklearn ‘Comparison of Jenkins with Bamboo and TeamCity’ blog helps you with commonly asked questions if you are looking out for a job in DevOps. If you wish to learn Jenkins and build a career in DevOps domain, then check out our interactive, Continuous Integration with Jenkins Training, that comes with 24*7 support to guide you throughout your learning period. Please find the link for course details:

Continuous Integration with Jenkins

Continuous Integration with Jenkins Training

About the Course

Tecklearn has specially designed this Continuous Integration with Jenkins Training Course to advance your skills for a successful career in this domain. This course helps you learn server automation, continuous integration, build and configuration tools, Jenkins master-slave architecture, different types of plugins, implementing automated testing and more through hands-on projects and exercises. Upon completion of this online training, you will hold a solid understanding and hands-on experience with Jenkins.

Why Should you take Continuous Integration with Jenkins Training?

• Average salary of Jenkins Professional is $110k (Indeed.com Salary Data)
• Jenkins is an open-source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software.

What you will Learn in this Course?

Introduction to DevOps

• What is Software Development
• Software Development Life Cycle
• Why DevOps?
• What is DevOps?
• DevOps Lifecycle
• DevOps Tools
• Benefits of DevOps
• How DevOps is related to Agile Delivery
• DevOps Implementation

Continuous Integration with Jenkins

• Introduction to Continuous Integration and Jenkins
• Jenkins Management
• Jenkins Master Slave Architecture
• Tools Required for CI
• Understanding CI/CD Pipelines
• Creating an end-to-end automated CI/CD Pipeline
• Jenkins Versions

406